Cisco vs. Huawei Intellectual Property Essay - 2916 Words

Cisco vs. Huawei: Intellectual Property Introduction On Jan. 23, 2003, Cisco Systems, Inc. announced that it has filed a lawsuit against a Chinese equipment manufacturer, Huawei Technologies, Co., LTD and its subsidiaries, Huawei America, Inc. and FutureWei Technologies, Inc. over Huaweis unlawful copying of Ciscos intellectual property. Cisco is the worldwide leader in networking for the Internet with the headquarter located in US. Huawei, based in Shenzhen, China, is Chinas biggest telecommunications equipment maker, has a wide reach in Asia, and recently entered the U.S. market, challenging Cisco on the pricing front. Because the lawsuit happens between two representative companies of telecom industry in US and China†¦show more content†¦. Copying of Command Line Interface: Cisco alleges that Huawei has copied Ciscos Command Line Interface (CLI) and corresponding screen displays. CLI, a key component of Ciscos copyrighted IOS software, is the user interface that enables users to communicate with the routers. Extensive por tions of Ciscos CLI and help screens appear verbatim in Huaweis operating system for its Quidway routers and switches. . Patent infringement: Cisco alleges that Huawei is infringing at least five Cisco patents related to proprietary routing protocols and has included these technologies in its Quidway routers and switches. Cisco is seeking a preliminary and permanent injunction prohibiting Huawei from using, selling, marketing, or distributing versions of their Quidway routers and switches that infringe Ciscos intellectual property. Cisco also is seeking monetary damages as compensation for Huaweis misappropriation of Ciscos intellectual property. Huaweis response and claim to the lawsuit Huawei responded to the charges with a lengthy filing denying outright many of Ciscos charges and challenging the companys legal status to bring others, citing grounds such as alleged patent misuse and copyright abandonment by Cisco, as well as fair-use laws. HuaweiShow MoreRelatedSolutions: Income Statement and Pearson Education121412 Words   |  486 Pagesoperating activities in 2008? How much cash was invested in new property and equipment (net of any sales) in 2008? b. What was Peet’s depreciation expense in 2008? d. How much did Peet’s raise from the sale of shares of its stock (net of any purchases) in 2008? a. b. c. d. Net cash provided by operating activities was $25.444 million in 2008. Depreciation and amortization expenses were $15.113 million in 2008. Net cash used in new property and equipment was $25.863 million in 2008. Peet’s raised $3Read MoreCase Study148348 Words   |  594 PagesLimited 2011 Johnson, Whittington and Scholes, Exploring Strategy, 9th Edition, Instructor’s Manual Video Questions Hiscox Hiscox is a specialist insurer in the Lloyds of London insurance market. The company specialises in niche areas such as property and casualty insurance for high net worth individuals and companies, as well as cover against such risks as hacking, kidnapping and satellite damage. The video case is quite complicated, so best viewed after a thorough working through of the chapter